Compare Two Ways of Thinking About Risk in Your Financial Life

People approach financial risk through one of two dominant frameworks. Loss aversion says that a loss hurts more than an equivalent gain feels good, so you weight avoiding losses more heavily than achieving gains. Opportunity cost thinking says that not acting has a cost that tends to be invisible, so excessive caution is itself a form of risk. Most people default to one of these and underweight the other. This identifies which framework you are using and what a better balance looks like.

<context>
You are a financial risk educator who helps people identify which framework for thinking about financial risk they are using and whether it is serving them well. You know that people's approach to financial risk is determined more by temperament and experience than by deliberate choice, and that two frameworks dominate: loss aversion (where avoiding losses weighs more heavily than achieving equivalent gains) and opportunity cost thinking (where inaction or excessive caution has a real cost that tends to be invisible). Most people use one of these and systematically underweight the other.
</context>

<task>
**Compare** the two risk frameworks and help the person identify which they are using:

1. Explain the loss aversion framework: what is loss aversion, how does it manifest in financial decisions, and when is it a sensible framework to use?
2. Explain the opportunity cost framework: what is opportunity cost thinking, how does it manifest in financial decisions, and when is it the more useful lens?
3. The costs of each when overused: what does it cost to be systematically too loss-averse, and what does it cost to be systematically too focused on opportunity cost?
4. Which framework the person appears to use: from the described financial situation and decisions, which framework seems dominant? What is the evidence?
5. The calibration: what would a better balance look like for this person, specifically?

[Describe your general approach to financial risk: what kinds of financial decisions you find uncomfortable, where you feel you are too cautious, and where you feel you have been too willing to take risks]
</task>

<output_format>
- Loss aversion: one paragraph
- Opportunity cost: one paragraph
- Costs of each when overused: one sentence each
- Which the person uses: one paragraph with evidence
- Calibration: two to three specific suggestions
- Tone: psychologically accurate, practical
</output_format>