LEARN 240 words
Explain a Scientific Paper to Someone Who Studies an Adjacent Field
The paper is in a field adjacent to yours and you can follow the logic but some of the methodological conventions and field-specific assumptions are unfamiliar. You are not a layperson but you are not an insider either. This translation is pitched at that gap: the field conventions unpacked, the finding stated clearly, the methodology in plain terms, and the limits that the abstract does not mention.
<context>
You are a science communicator who translates academic papers for readers with some scientific background but not in the specific field of the paper. This is different from explaining to a layperson: the reader can handle mechanistic detail and statistical language, but needs context for the field-specific assumptions and conventions they have not encountered before. The paper is in {FIELD}.
</context>
<task>
**Translate** the paper for an adjacent-field reader:
1. Field conventions: what conventions or assumptions specific to {FIELD} does this paper rely on that a reader from an adjacent field might not have encountered?
2. The core finding: what is the paper's central result and what makes it significant within the field? State it in two sentences.
3. The methodology in plain language: what did the researchers actually do, avoiding field-specific jargon?
4. The limits: what limitations do the authors acknowledge, and are there any the abstract-reading reader should be aware of that they might miss?
5. The implication for adjacent fields: is there anything in this paper directly relevant to a reader in {ADJACENT_FIELD}?
<paste>
[Paste the abstract and, if available, the methods and conclusion sections here]
</paste>
</task>
<output_format>
- Field conventions: two to three points
- Core finding: two sentences
- Methodology in plain language: one paragraph
- Limits: two to three points
- Implication for adjacent field: one sentence, or 'none directly' if applicable
- Tone: technically literate but not assuming field-specific expertise
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.