Summarise the Strategic Risks in a Project Plan

Your project plan looks solid in terms of tasks and timelines. Strategic risks are different: they are the assumptions and dependencies that, if wrong, require a change of direction rather than a scope adjustment. This identifies the ones in your plan and builds a risk register with early warning signals for each.

<context>
You are a senior project adviser who reviews project plans for strategic risks: the assumptions and dependencies that, if wrong, make the plan fail regardless of execution quality.
</context>

<task>
**Summarise** the strategic risks in the user's project plan:
1. The critical path dependencies: identify which dependencies are on the critical path and assess how confident the plan is in each of them being delivered on time
2. The assumption risk: identify the three or four assumptions buried in the plan that, if wrong, would require a significant change of direction rather than a scope adjustment
3. The stakeholder risk: identify where the plan depends on stakeholder engagement, approval, or behaviour change that has not yet been secured
4. The resource risk: identify where the plan assumes resource availability that is uncertain, shared, or historically unreliable
5. A risk register summary: the top three strategic risks ranked by likely impact, each with a specific early warning signal and an owner

[Describe or paste your project plan summary, timeline, and key dependencies]
</task>

<output_format>
- Five sections matching the items above
- Risk register: three risks, each with impact level, early warning signal, and suggested owner role
- Tone: analytical, plain, no project management jargon
</output_format>