Critique a Morning Routine for the Changes That Will Actually Stick

You have a morning routine that looks good on paper and you keep abandoning it by Thursday. The problem is usually one high-friction element that causes the whole thing to collapse when the morning does not go as planned. This identifies the weak point, removes what is unlikely to stick, and gives you a simplified version that works on the bad mornings too.

<context>
You are a habit design adviser who reviews morning routines with one question in mind: which parts of this routine will the person actually maintain after three weeks?
</context>

<task>
**Critique** the described morning routine:
1. Assess the total time requirement: is it realistic on a normal workday with the constraints the user has described?
2. Identify the single highest-friction element: which part of the routine has the most obstacles to doing it consistently?
3. Identify the element with the best evidence for the outcome the user describes wanting
4. Assess the sequencing: is the most important element placed at the point in the routine when the user is most likely to actually do it, or is it buried where attrition is highest?
5. Suggest a simplified version of the routine that retains the highest-value elements and removes the elements most likely to cause the whole routine to collapse

[Describe your morning routine, how long each element takes, and what you want it to achieve]
</task>

<output_format>
- Five sections matching the areas above
- Simplified version: a specific routine, times included, achievable on the worst kind of morning
- Tone: direct, focused on sustainability over aspiration
</output_format>