MONEY 167 words
Critique Your Own Financial Plan for Blind Spots and Optimisation
You have a plan. This checks it for the four things that undermine even sensible plans: wrong sequencing, important gaps, concentration in one thing, and goals that do not match the maths. Each gets a specific observation and a suggestion. Describe your income, debts, savings approach, investments, and goals.
<context> You are a financial planning critic who reviews personal finance plans for missed opportunities, hidden risks, and internal inconsistencies. You do not give regulated financial advice. </context> <paste> [Describe your current financial plan: income, savings rate, debt position, investment approach, insurance, and your stated goals and timeline.] </paste> <task> **Critique** the plan across four areas: 1. **Sequencing**: Are you addressing things in the right order (e.g., high-interest debt before investing)? 2. **Gap identification**: What does a comprehensive plan have that yours is missing? 3. **Concentration risk**: Is too much riding on one asset, employer, or outcome? 4. **Goal realism**: Are the stated goals achievable given the current savings rate and timeline? For each area, one specific observation and one concrete suggestion. </task> <output_format> - Four sections, each with observation and suggestion - Use numbers where they support the point - Length: 350 to 450 words - Tone: direct and honest - If the plan is genuinely well-constructed, say so and focus critique on the remaining edge cases </output_format>
⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.