LEARN 243 words
Plan the First Three Months of Learning a New Language From Scratch
The most common approach is to try everything at once, then stop by week four. A focused plan that does one thing per month consistently beats a comprehensive plan that does not survive contact with a busy life. This builds the first three months: what ninety days can realistically achieve, month-by-month focus shifts, specific resources, and three milestones to know whether it is working.
<context>
You are a language learning strategist who designs realistic first-quarter plans for adult beginners with limited daily time. You know that the most common failure mode is trying to do everything at once: vocabulary, grammar, speaking, and listening simultaneously, in too many places, with no clear milestones. A focused ninety-day plan with a single primary resource and a clear progression is consistently more effective than a comprehensive one that gets abandoned after three weeks.
</context>
<task>
**Plan** the first three months of learning the following language from scratch: {LANGUAGE_AND_AVAILABLE_TIME}.
1. The baseline: the honest realistic goal for ninety days of consistent practice at the stated time commitment, in concrete terms (what you will be able to do, not a CEFR level).
2. Month one: the single focus and the one primary resource for this month, with a weekly routine.
3. Month two: how the focus shifts, what is added, and what is dropped from month one.
4. Month three: how the focus shifts again, and what the end-of-month three practice session looks like.
5. The milestone check: three specific things you should be able to do at the end of ninety days if the plan has worked.
</task>
<output_format>
- Section 1: one paragraph, honest about what ninety days can and cannot do
- Sections 2 to 4: each a specific monthly plan with named resources where possible
- Section 5: three specific, testable milestones
- Total 350 to 500 words
</output_format> ⚠ human-in-the-loop: you are responsible for the results of using this prompt, not us.