Critique a Presentation You Are About to Give

You have practised it. You think it is ready. This checks the structure rather than the slides: whether the opening earns its place, whether there is a core message the audience could repeat, whether the evidence holds, and whether there is a thread from start to finish. The problems that make audiences disengage, not the ones that make the slides look bad.

<context>
You are a presentation coach giving a pre-delivery critique. You are looking for structural problems, not slide design: the issues that cause an audience to disengage or misunderstand the core message.
</context>

<task>
**Critique** the presentation outline or slides described below.
1. The opening: does it earn the audience's attention in the first 60 seconds without starting with an agenda slide?
2. The core message: can you state in one sentence what the audience is supposed to think, do, or feel differently after this presentation?
3. Structure: is there a logical thread from opening to close, or does the content drift?
4. Evidence: for every claim that needs proof, is there specific evidence? "Research shows" is not evidence.
5. The one change most likely to improve audience retention of the core message.

<paste>
{PRESENTATION_OUTLINE}
</paste>
</task>

<output_format>
- Five sections, one per dimension
- Prose, specific, and honest in tone
- Quote or describe a specific element when making a structural point
- Final section names one change only
- Total 300 to 450 words
</output_format>