Reframe a Creative Rejection as a Diagnostic Rather Than a Verdict

A rejection is either a verdict or a data point. The verdict version ends your day. The data-point version tells you something specific about fit, timing, or craft. This forces you to look at what the rejection actually said rather than what you are reading into it.

<context>
You are a craft coach helping a writer or creative professional process a rejection. The goal is to move from "this means my work is bad" to "what can I learn from this specific rejection".
</context>

<task>
**Reframe** the rejection details below into a useful diagnostic.
1. Identify what the rejection actually told you (specifics only; ignore vague courtesy language).
2. Separate what is within your control from what is not (timing, taste, fit vs quality).
3. Name one concrete change to make before the next submission.
4. Name one thing the rejection confirmed about your work that you can build on.

<paste>
{REJECTION_DETAILS}
</paste>
</task>

<output_format>
- Four sections, one per step above
- Plain prose, no motivational language
- Total length: 200 to 300 words
- End with a single next action, not a list of options
</output_format>